Contact:cdent@burningchrome.com
Raskin, Jef. (1999). Presenting Information. In R. Jacobson (Ed.), _Information design_, (p. 341-348). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Frames the field of Information Design by recasting it as Designing Information Representation. Common myths about information and other associated terms are debunked and then given definitions of which the author approves. A path, with unconscious knowledge of formal language and methodology as the goal, for the apprentice designer of information representation is suggested. -cjd -=-=- First reaction: Who is this Jef Raskin guy? So I went to find out. Okay, he has the credentials to support his tone. Second reaction: Interesting, how is it that so many authors writing in Information Science are able to contradict so many other authors writing in Information Science about the definition of information? Raskin, at least, attempts to provide a definite definition on which to hang the rest of his discussion. He leaves little room for doubt. I believe this is a mistake. Presenting information as a definite thing which can be measured belittles the importance of perspective and context in the conception of information. We can discuss information as thing, and can even state unequivocally that it is some thing, but perhaps we are better off to instead list all that it can be in its many incarnations as thing, relationship, process and network. Freeing information in this way, though, leads to exactly the sort of draping "in the mantle of technological modernity" that Raskin complains about. So be it: an unconstrained definition of information can lead to the creation of more thought and thus more information, about information. The key is representing all that information about information in effective ways that provide launching points for learning. Back to the Index