Contact:cdent@burningchrome.com
Referring to: Passini, R. (1999). Sign-posting information design. In R. Jacobson (Ed.), _Information design_ (p. 83-98). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 01:23:51 -0500 (EST) From: cdent@burningchrome.com To: ejacob_597ia_fall01@indiana.edu Subject: Passini v. HCI Passini states: In fact, a strong argument can be made that design solutions can only be properly assessed by potential users--regardless of how confident the designer is about the proposed design. but then goes on to say: There is also a danger, however, in relying solely on assessment research to build a discipline: it tends to be conservative. Although it produces improvements on present conventions, it is not particularly well suited for generating new ideas and questioning existing assumptions and practices. To me this suggests that the HCI discpline is, at its core, rather conservative. I think this is generally supported by the literature: user testing is used to create systems which perform according to expectations. Rare is the intentional disturbance of patterns of behavior resulting in revolutionary new ways of doing things (the distinction between revolution and evolution is important here). A damn shame, I say. I want to see technology help rip me free of hackneyed ideas and behaviors. Why do current interfaces on many computers attempt to suggest a desktop, as if sitting at a desk were actually a good thing? I think, as Passini suggests, there must be an edge where new things happen. Not everyone will want to be out there on the edge, but somebody needs to do it. e-yawning..., Back to the Index